The reason I didn't include her is I thought she had zero chance of winning. She is not well-remembered by the general public.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Helmut Hamm <[email protected]> wrote: > If Lizabeth Scott is not included, what kind of contest is this anyway? > > Helmut > > > Sorry, but somehow I don't get the allure of Jane Russell. Certainly not > a classic beauty like Gene Tierney. Also much too large in stature for my > taste. I prefer actresses on the more petite side. I'd pick Barbara > Stanwyck in her heyday over Jane Russell...and she wasn't a classic beauty > either... > Rick > > In a message dated 7/19/2012 9:24:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > the fact that gene tierney didn't run away with this round has me a bit > concerned with her chances overall...not that it really matters, but still. > > peter. > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bruce Hershenson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> We are on the last round of the first 8 Face/Offs (after today the 8 >> winners of the first round will Face/Off against each other) and this last >> first round one is surprisingly close! >> >> With just a couple of hours to go, the score is Jane Russell 83 >> or >> Gene Tierney 88 >> >> If you haven't yet voted, go to: >> http://www.emovieposter.com/faceoff_archives.php >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Kirby McDaniel <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Well, she's no Jane Withers or even Edna May Oliver, but Loren and Lollo >>> can't touch her. >>> >>> K. >>> >>> >>> On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Zeev Drach wrote: >>> >>> I looked at Zazu’s pitts, so!?**** >>> **** >>> Z.**** >>> **** >>> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of >>> *Kirby >>> McDaniel >>> *Sent:* July 8, 2012 8:56 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] I need help with a new series of "Sexiest >>> pre-1960 actress ever" Face/Offs!**** >>> **** >>> I think if you people will take a good look at Zasu Pitts you will see >>> that she really**** >>> puts all these broads in the shade. Oh, dear.**** >>> **** >>> K.**** >>> **** >>> **** >>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Simon Oram wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> Any women that has a cantilever bra designed for her ‘must’ be sexy.** >>> ** >>> **** >>> Simon**** >>> **** >>> *From:* Zeev Drach <[email protected]>**** >>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 08, 2012 1:22 PM**** >>> *To:* [email protected]**** >>> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] I need help with a new series of "Sexiest >>> pre-1960 actress ever" Face/Offs!**** >>> **** >>> I don’t think Diana Dors qualifies based on your own criteria. If you >>> leave her in, then you must open the list to all the “Bad Girls” of the >>> 50’s, and the list is endless(Mamie Van Doren, Cleo moore, Dorothy Malone, >>> Jan Sterling, Beverly Michaels, etc, etc, …….. where are you Michael >>> Greenwood when we need you….).**** >>> **** >>> Jane Russell though, MUST be on the list. Omitting her is >>> unforgivable. Jane Russell eats five Audrey Hepburns for breakfast…..who’s >>> with me on that?**** >>> **** >>> Zeev**** >>> **** >>> **** >>> *From:* MoPo List >>> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> >>> ] *On Behalf Of *Bruce Hershenson >>> *Sent:* July 7, 2012 9:12 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [MOPO] I need help with a new series of "Sexiest pre-1960 >>> actress ever" Face/Offs!**** >>> **** >>> I am going to start a three week series of Face/Offs, choosing the >>> Sexiest pre-1960 actress ever! >>> >>> Here's how it will work: >>> There will be 16 to start. The first 8 days they will go against each >>> other. The next four days the winners of the first 8 will go against each >>> other. Then the next two days the winners of those four will go against >>> each other. and then the two last winners will have a final Face/Off! >>> >>> Now here are the rules: >>> 1) They must be incredibly sexy (so I don't think great actresses like >>> Bette Davis or Barbara Stanwyck or Joan Crawford qualify, but I am open to >>> opposing viewpoints!) >>> 2) They must be talented actresses who had substantial careers (so I >>> don't think super-sexy women like Jayne Mansfield or Gina Lollabrigida >>> qualify, but I am open to opposing viewpoints!) >>> 3) They must have had a substantial portion of their career before 1960, >>> and as an adult, so Natalie Wood, Ann-Margret, and tons of others don't >>> qualify. >>> >>> Here is a preliminary list (in no particular order): >>> Marilyn Monroe >>> Sofia Loren >>> Brigitte Bardot >>> Jean Harlow >>> Catherine Deneuve >>> Grace Kelly >>> Audrey Hepburn >>> Kim Novak >>> Louise Brooks >>> Elizabeth Taylor >>> Ava Gardner >>> Ingrid Bergman >>> Lana Turner >>> Veronica Lake >>> Gene Tierney >>> Rita Hayworth >>> Hedy Lamarr >>> Diana Dors >>> * >>> HERE IS WHAT I AM ASKING OF YOU!* >>> 1) Who deserves to be on the above list, but isn't? >>> 2) Who is on the above list, but doesn't deserve to be? >>> 3) What is the sexiest single image you have ever seen of any or all of >>> the above (or your alternate choices)? I will use the best of them to >>> create the Face/Off images! >>> >>> I will be fascinated to see what you great minds come up with. If this >>> goes well, I will follow it with a "post-1960" version. >>> >>> -- >>> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the >>> eMoviePoster.com<http://emovieposter.com/> >>> team >>> P.O. Box 874 >>> West Plains, MO 65775 >>> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we >>> take lunch) >>> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> >>> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> >>> >>> **** >>> **** >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com**** >>> ___________________________________________________________________**** >>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List**** >>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]**** >>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L**** >>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.**** >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com**** >>> ___________________________________________________________________**** >>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List**** >>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]**** >>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L**** >>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.**** >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com**** >>> ___________________________________________________________________**** >>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List**** >>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]**** >>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L**** >>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.**** >>> **** >>> **** >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com**** >>> ___________________________________________________________________**** >>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List**** >>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]**** >>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L**** >>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.**** >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>> ___________________________________________________________________ How >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: >>> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >>> SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its >>> content. >>> >>> >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>> ___________________________________________________________________ How >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: >>> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >>> SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its >>> content. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team >> P.O. Box 874 >> West Plains, MO 65775 >> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we >> take lunch) >> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> >> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> >> >> >> >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >> ___________________________________________________________________ How >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: >> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF >> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >> >> > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ How > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: > [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF > MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ How > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: > [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF > MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ How > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: > [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF > MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. > > -- Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team P.O. Box 874 West Plains, MO 65775 Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take lunch) our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
