I agree David…

 

Kind Regards

 

Ben Wadley

All About Movies Pty Ltd

Movie Memorabilia  - Original Vintage Movie Posters and Lobby Cards

Website: www.allaboutmovies.com.au

Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/AllAboutMoviesAu

Follow us on Twitter:  <http://www.twitter.com/AllAboutMovies1> 
www.twitter.com/AllAboutMovies1

From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2014 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] About MoPo

 

This forum (like all forums) are set up with the sole purpose of bringing 
like-minded people together to discuss a common subject; in fact it still says 
that on the MoPo webpage "Movie Poster Discussion Group". But if one looks at 
one's inbox over any period of time, it looks more like a Movie Poster 
Advertising Group, to the point that it is the most common and voluminous 
subject to hit my mail box each week - it is simply, by definition, spam so why 
comment publicly when almost all there is to comment to is spam?

The opportunity to get in front (for free) of 370 odd people (and all one has 
to do is hit send) is obviously too much of a juicy carrot for some to ignore 
and so they take advantage of it.

I would suggest that one advertising post (or any variable of same) per week 
would bring back the talk and perhaps turn this into a Movie Poster Discussion 
Group rather than a Movie Poster Advertising Forum.

David Rew



JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia did previously state on 5/03/2014 11:35 AM:

Yes, I think you are right.


----- Original Message ----- 

From: Neil Jaworski <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: JOHN REID <mailto:[email protected]>  Vintage Movie Memorabilia ; 
[email protected] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:25 AM

Subject: Re: [MOPO] About MoPo

 

Hi John, I totally agree with you but we probably have to accept that - over 
the long life of MOPO - schisms have emerged & become fixed.  MOPO has become 
increasingly bad-tempered & tribal over the years and so terrific people who 
used to post don't now post very often.  I'm thinking about people like Andrea 
& Sue but there are many others.  Probably there's a silent majority who just 
feel it's not worth the trouble posting in case they get attacked.
Neil





 


  _____  


From: JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia  <mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2014, 0:10
Subject: Re: [MOPO] About MoPo

 

I agree with Tommy that some people might mistakenly hit the "Reply" button 
rather than "Reply All" but I am really talking about people who deliberately 
reply "Offlist" with private comments. They often make very good and valid 
points and its a pity that they dont want to post to everyone on the List.

 


----- Original Message ----- 

From: Chris Quarles <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: [email protected] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:55 AM

Subject: Re: [MOPO] About MoPo

 

People need to learn who to use email. It's very easy.

 

Chris Quarles

Sent from my iPad


On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Scott Burns <[email protected]> wrote:

The decision was made many many moons ago to make the default REPLY TO address 
the address of the original sender, rather than the mopo-l address. This was 
done because there were several instances of people who had meant their reply 
be private to the post’s original author but instead the message went out to 
MoPo at large.

We can revisit this decision if you like, but I do remember a couple of very 
private negotiations that accidentally went public.

You can always use REPLY ALL, then your post gets sent to the original author 
AND the group.

Opinions on changing the REPLY default?

Scott

MoPo List Owner

From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tommy Barr
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 7:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] About MoPo

I suspect part of the problem is that when you click on 'reply' it addresses 
the response to only the original sender by default, and you have to scroll 
down to send to all the subscribers. Might be better if that could be reversed.

Tommy

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:15 AM, JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia 
<[email protected]> wrote:

In the last few years I have been getting a lot of private responses and 
comments from MoPo members. It does seem that MoPo generates a great deal of 
discussion but a lot of it is "Offlist" for the recipient only so the thoughts 
of various members are never made public to the entire list. I wonder if this 
is just applicable to MoPo because all of the email addresses are readily 
available. I would imagine that this wouldn't happen so much on the other 
discussion boards because it takes more time and effort to contact members off 
list. Maybe it might be better for people to post their thoughts publicly 
rather than private emails which defeats the purpose of a discussion board.

Just an observation.


JOHN REID VINTAGE MOVIE MEMORABILIA
Websites:
www.moviemem.com <http://www.moviemem.com/> 
www.OzeFilm.com <http://www.ozefilm.com/> 

www.OzeMoviePoster.com <http://www.ozemovieposter.com/>      
www.OzeAuction.com <http://www.ozeauction.com/> 
www.BodyCorporateNews.com <http://www.bodycorporatenews.com/> 
Facebook: 
www.facebook.com/moviemem
Mailing Address: 
John Reid
PO Box 92
Elanora
Qld 4221
Australia

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to