[SA previously]
> Couldn't static quality also be considered a form of karma?
This could also be worded another way. Couldn't static quality
also be considered a certain karmic perspective? One way of looking at
this could be:
karma is the past, no matter how long ago (a nano-second or billions),
and this past is the structure in which all creative futures have to
work with. A structure still remains, though ever-anew, and thus goes
the cycle.
SA
Ron:
SA,
does it give the now a context for acting? in other words without karma
is action impossible?
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest
shows on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
