> [SA previously]
> > Couldn't static quality also be considered a
> form of karma?
[Ron]
> does it give the now a context for acting? in other
> words without karma
> is action impossible?
What I'm seeing is the moq brings a better
contextual understanding to Kant's 'a prior' (I'm not
very familiar with Kant, is this the word for what
Kant believed, which is in opposition with the 'blank
slate' of the mind), also, to karma. Karma states
whatever has come previously in ones life (and in
India this would mean past lives, but the moq would
put this in an EVOLUTIONARY context with the levels
defining the past) influences ones present. In moq
context, karma is the static patterns built-up or
cultivated over time influencing dq in any value and
moral awakening moment. By 'awakening moment' this is
again static patterns. I'm describing the renewal
process of static patterns in their transaction/dance
with dynamic quality. Thus, what moral and value
PRECEDENT are any particular static patterns setting?
What moral and value SLANT are any particular static
patterns having on dynamic experiences? Thus, moral
and value decisions at the edge of experience are
IMPACTED by already established static patterns. So,
the precedent, slant, and impacted aspects of the
already existing evolutionary static patterns with
dynamic quality, this I would say is the moq
definition of karma.
Does this make sense in a moq way?
I looking for how the moq is moral. This might
be an 'in' for me to understand how the moq is moral.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
