All, While perusing my backlog of message in PEIRCE-L (the Charles Peirce equivalent to our MD), I found a post with the following thought...
"wouldn't the question be what do we mean by "unity" expressed in terms of how we assess its effects? At bottom--if there is one--an "object" is a very loosely associated and dynamic assemblage of stuff, and "unity" is more like pattern than substance. There one might describe a "unit" or "object" in terms of redundancy (expected pattern vs. chaos)." (Author's name is Bill Bailey) Sounds very MOQish, no? Arlo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
