[SA previously]
> > So why are you against something that's not
> real? Isn't that like trying to hit a tree in a
field
> that has no trees?
[Platt]
> I'm not against something that's not real. I'm
> against calling what's real an illusion.
So, instead of saying Buddhism is not interested
in "this world", as you put it, then maybe you could
define how Buddhism is real instead of an illusion.
Maybe?
> > > > [Platt had said]
> > > > > So you can't tell the difference between the
> > > woods and Santa Claus? How strange.
> >
> > [SA then responded]
> > > > Oh, was I talking about the woods and
> Santa Claus above? ...maybe I'll keep re-reading
what I wrote
> and find those words in there somewhere above.
> > [Platt previously]
> > > I talked about the woods and Santa Claus and
> asked how you told the difference?
> > > I assume your answer is the former is real and
> the latter is illusory.
[SA previously]
> > Don't assume what I know!! Your assuming is
> > dictorial and doesn't allow me to think.
[Platt]
> Sorry. Didn't mean to offend. I assume what you know
> when it's not clear by your statements what you
know. If I assume
> incorrectly, you say so.
> That's how discussion progresses.
Thank you, let's go back to your original
question here, "So you can't tell the difference
between the woods and Santa Claus?"
It depends on how or what your defining woods and
Santa Claus as. In what context?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
