[Platt]
> Really you should get a copy of "Lila's Child." Much
> of this discussion about
> whether the "self" is real or an illusion is based
> on Pirsig's comments there and
> in other places. You won't find much about the
> Buddhist "self" in Lila, which makes
> me wonder how important to the MOQ is it?
Thanks Platt! Now here I definitely see why your
driving this home. I haven't read "Lila's Child", so,
maybe you have a point about the 'self and the moq'.
I don't know. I've heard of the little self (static
quality) and big self (dynamic quality), which then
again goes back to where this discussion of logic,
illogic, real, illusion, self, buddhist self, and zen
self seems to be rooted in. Instead of talking about
these off-shoots, maybe we should be talking about the
root?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
