>[Ham]
>Quality implies what is universally good, whereas value reflects what
>one enjoys, desires or aspires to. I maintain that it is a mistake to
>equate these human sensibilities.
[Ron]
This is interesting, I see no implied universals except generalized
concepts
that all generally agree apon. Once specifics are developed differental
viewpoints
develop. What you are saying is that Quality is general whereas value is
specific.
They both mean the same thing but refer to differing aspects given the
context
of implication. The mistake is to apply a generalized concept to a
specific context.
not switching the terms themselves.
Value and Quality are interchangeable it's the context in which they are
used that
makes the difference.
I agree it is a mistake to apply generalizations to specifics, Pirsig's
whole aim
is about just this mistake, a logic trap indeed.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
