> [SA previously]
> What do you think Krimel?
> [Krimel]
> I think the important lessons of Zen take seconds to
> learn and years to
> appreciate. I personally don't find much use in its
> practice. It is Buddhism
> and Tao filtered through Shinto. I am content with
> Tao.
What about Chan? Since your interested in
Daoism, your answer might be that Chan is Buddhism
filtered through Daoism {and I would add Confucianism
(the relational aspects and 'ren' the character
emphasis, in other words, how one is, how one relates
to others and ones ability to do so in a positively
powerful way)}. I respect this answer, and it would
help me understand what 'schools' are emphasized in
your discussions.
Also, what does Daoism say about moral patterns?
That was why I still find the levels significant. The
levels are explicit about morals.
I did not find anything that jumped out at me in
which I disagreed with in the rest of your post. It
was quite detailed and informative in the relational
patterning. It was excellent. Thanks.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
