Hi Spirits (SA) On Nov. 23 you said: > Bo, if I finally have figured out what your saying, then blow me down! > When you say 'moq' could I instead say 'quality' or 'dynamic quality'? > I'll wait for your answer before I conclude if I have finally reached > the point where I understand you.
When I say MOQ I mean "Quality Reality" because the opening postulate is "Quality is Reality". This is a bit cumbersome, hence MOQ which has replaced the SOM as reality. > [SA previously] > > > Is it pure experience/direct experience? > [Bo] > > Of course. We know from ZAMM that Phaedrus reached > > the > > insight that some pure - direct - experience > > preceded (what he > > called) "intellect" (much like Poincare's "beauty" > > and James' > > "aesthetic continuum") this was what later became > > Dynamic > > Quality so DQ=pure experience=direct experience. You found this making sense, but then you ought to agree with my SOL (intellect=S/O) because - as said - ZAMM's first notion was that of a "pre-intellectual/intellectual" reality in contrast to the reigning "subject/object" one. The pre-intellectual something (that he called Quality) spawns Intellect (which is the S/O dichotomy) thus it's plain that Phaedrus of ZAMM saw intellect=S/O. Why Pirsig of LILA changed this is a mystery. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
