SOM or subject object metaphysics is a term coined by Pirsig himself to describe
As Steve Peterson stated: "western philosophical tradition." Originally the Greek term "philosophy" was applied to all intellectual Endeavours'. SOM is typically characterized as analytically dominated. "analytic philosophy is defined by its emphasis on clarity and argument, often achieved via modern formal logic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_logic> and analysis of language <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language> , and a respect for the natural sciences <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_sciences> .[3] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-2#_note-2> [4] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-3#_note-3> The historical roots of analytic philosophy can be summarily characterised in three broad strokes:[5] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-4#_note-4> First, the positivist <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism> view that there are no specifically philosophical truths and that the object of philosophy is the logical clarification of thoughts. This contrasts with the traditional foundationalism <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism> , deriving from Aristotle <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle> , that views philosophy as a special sort of science, the highest one, which investigates the fundamental reasons and principles of everything.[6] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-5#_note-5> As a result, analytic philosophers have often considered their inquiries as continuous with, or subordinate to, those of the natural sciences.[7] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-6#_note-6> Second, the view that the logical clarification of thoughts can only be achieved by analysis of the logical form <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_form> of philosophical propositions.[8] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-7#_note-7> The logical form of a proposition is a way of representing it (often using the formal grammar and symbolism of a logical system) to display its similarity with all other propositions of the same type. However, analytic philosophers disagree widely about the correct logical form of ordinary language.[9] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-8#_note-8> Third, a rejection of sweeping philosophical systems in favour of close attention to detail.[10] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-9#_note-9> Among some (but by no means all) analytic philosophers, this rejection of "grand theory" has taken the form of a defence of common sense and ordinary language against the pretensions of metaphysicians.[11] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy#_note-10#_note-10> " I urge you to read the whole article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
