Steve & Craig, [Craig] We have (a) subjects & objects in SOM, where they are the two fundamental categories of existents & (b) subjective (social & intellectual) & objective (inorganic & biological) static patterns in the MOQ, where they comprise the fundamental categories only of static existents. IMHO (a) has its usual meaning. The question for me is what is the relation of (a) to (b)?
[Krimel] (a) Is more or less how the S/O spit gets discussed here but as I have said this seem more or a linguistic misunderstanding that a serious issue. There is only a single subject attempting to communicate with objects that appear to have properties like itself. (b) I do not think this characterizes S/O at all I think Steve is correct to note that the MoQ divides "reality" into things that wiggle (DQ) and things that hold still (SQ). We as "subjects" see these properties internally and externally and we can come to a shared (intersubjective) understanding of them. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
