Hi Ham For me the meaning of experience-quality prior to any notion of the individual or perceiver is this:
a living experience full of tress and sky and sunshine and animals and clouds and people and grass, etc is what it is to exist and be alive, experience-life is not confined to some boundary called a perceiver, experience only exists when trees and birds and sun's are interacting with human organisms, the human alone and isolated does not have experience, experience is what occurs when much more is going on, experience is a process between organisms and light and heat and energy and their changes, experience transcends an isolated perceiver, experience is only possible when suns shine and birds sing and eyes flash and photons are absorbed, so experience requires not a perceiver but a cosmos. David M > No, I do not. I suppose that "first" and "last" apply only to a system in > transition, such as physical existence. I equate Quality with Value. And > value, as I define it, is made aware only to a cognizant entity that > stands > apart from its source or essence. Thus, a world without awareness is a > world without value. For me Quality is meaningless in the absence of a > perceiver. > > Regards, > Ham > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
