Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Platt > > You said > "description of me as chronically dishonest in no way hides complexity" > I say - Course it does - as I said I'm happy to use short-hand when > useful and to the point. You ignored the fact I said that - explicitly > in this mail. > > You said > "Gee, I thought you of all people would get a kick out of the article ..." > I say, of course I may, but as I said and you ignored, I've not read > it yet. I was responding explicitly to your points, not the article, > and you as usual, are ignorant of mine. > > You said > "Yes, and Caesar might not be dead." > I say, very unlikely, and there is probably good tangible evidence, > and enormous statistical evidence on the side of that being false. > Unlike doubtful pregnancy. > > Anyway, thanks for proving my point. > You are ignorant and dishonest.
"Very unlikely" Caesar might not be dead? Duh. Boy, are you smart! > Now, where is that arcticle ? Evidence you pay no attention to what I was talking about. Proving you are dumb and getting dumber. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
