Evidence Platt, that you "pretend" not to get the point. Dishonest and ignorant. Ian (PS - I was explicit, upfront in my first remark, that I had seen you link to the article, and was explicitly commenting on your remarks, not the article.)
On 2/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Platt > > > > You said > > "description of me as chronically dishonest in no way hides complexity" > > I say - Course it does - as I said I'm happy to use short-hand when > > useful and to the point. You ignored the fact I said that - explicitly > > in this mail. > > > > You said > > "Gee, I thought you of all people would get a kick out of the article ..." > > I say, of course I may, but as I said and you ignored, I've not read > > it yet. I was responding explicitly to your points, not the article, > > and you as usual, are ignorant of mine. > > > > You said > > "Yes, and Caesar might not be dead." > > I say, very unlikely, and there is probably good tangible evidence, > > and enormous statistical evidence on the side of that being false. > > Unlike doubtful pregnancy. > > > > Anyway, thanks for proving my point. > > You are ignorant and dishonest. > > "Very unlikely" Caesar might not be dead? Duh. Boy, are you smart! > > > Now, where is that arcticle ? > > Evidence you pay no attention to what I was talking about. > > Proving you are dumb and getting dumber. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
