Platt, your logic is useless, Since when did "dichotomies are OK if they are useful" represent a definition of useful. Umbrellas are useful too. Does the word "if" not register with you. It means some dichotomies are useful AND some are not.
Why do I bother ? Ian On 3/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Platt, Since when did useful mean either all or nothing. > > Funny, I thought you'd mastered "Dictionaries 101" > > Ian > > That's funny. Didn't you say once that dichotomies are OK if they are useful? > > > ------------------------------------------------- > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
