Ron I think it is worth exploring because at some level experience and science need to make sense in each other's terms.
David M > > Ron > > Let's change the question: > does DQ become SQ when the wave function collapses? > > Taking possibility objectively, see physicist Shimon Malin's > Nature Loves to Hide for this idea's plausible use. > > DM > > Hello DM, > Depends on how you interpret wave collapse. > do you mean that energy condenses or collapses > To form static patterns, then I would say DQ (infinite > Possibility) collapses to actual (static quality). > It certainly may be interpreted like this. > It may be an interesting way to discuss the flow of patterns > Of quality. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
