[Ian]
Arlo, I fail to see how finding life in the Universe will be a Copernican
revolution ? Surely we "know" it's there already, waiting to be found.
Yawn, tell us something new ? No evidence of non-existence Arlo, lack of 
evidence of existence. Your logic is slipping.

[Arlo]
I disagree. We speculate that it is there. And many hope it is there. And logic
tells us it MUST be there. But the nature of what this will mean is a mystery,
and I do think will reshape how we see ourselves (imagine if man does find
itself at the hands of a species that considers us to be no greater than we
consider ants). 

[Ian]
Contact is a different matter. The revolution would be if they were an evolved
intelligence and "taught" us something culturally

[Arlo]
Well, forgive me. I was thinking more along of the lines of contact than remote
evidence. 

[Ian]
Seriously Arlo, I think you have to find a better argument than arrogance for
some of the more sophisticated AP's concerning the fine-tuning arguments.
You're not arguing with Platt or Ham  here ;-)

[Arlo]
I'm not arguing with anybody. What is the point of contention here? That I do
not see the cosmos as being "perfectly balanced for life"? Sorry Ian, until we
have more solid evidence of life "out there", I don't see our little abode here
being evidence of any such thing, actually evidence to the contrary.

But before you going jumping all over me here, all I did was reaffirm the Fermi
Paradox, and if you think I am unaware of "sophisticated AP's" in response to
that, you are wrong. 

[Ian]
BTW I said "finely tuned" - perfectly balanced is someone else's language.

[Arlo]
That's even worse. At least balance suggests naturality, "finely tuned"
suggests craftsmanship. But I'll ask it again, on what evidence do you make
this claim? Theorizing about the vast quantities of life you "know" must be out
there does not count in my book, or saying the evidence MUST be out there, we
just have not found/seen it yet doesn't count either. What evidence, other than
life on earth, do you base this claim on? Asteroidal microbes? So again, I'll
say its the opposite. The cosmos seems "untuned" to support life, and the
rarity of life suggests its is an occasional happenstance that defies the odds.




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to