> [Krimel] > Cosmic purpose? This is an absurd notion. > If I were to grant you that such a thing exists, > please, I am seriously begging you, to tell me what > it is and how I would recognize it if I saw it.
[Ham] You "see it" continuously, yet you don't recognize it. Your intellect gets in the way. It binds you to the precept that any theory which cannot be confirmed empirically is false. In other words, you have succumbed to the collectivist view that one can ascribe "purpose and intention" to the universe but not to the self for which it was created. How sad. [Krimel] What in the heck are you talking about? I see it but don't recognize it? But you see it and do? So why can't you just tell me what it is so I can look harder? If you and I, at least theoretically, can see it; how is it not empirical? What in the world does this have to do with a collectivist view? I think you have me confused with someone else. I do not think the cosmos has a purpose but I most assuredly think that I do. Why do you refuse to answer my other questions? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
