Quoting Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > > [Platt]
> > > > > > > > Whether a germ knows there's an independent reality or not is
> > > > > > > > debatable since we don't know what it's like to be a germ.
> > > > > > > > That a germ knows that it's better for it to be in one place
> > > > > > > > rather than another can be assumed by its behavior.
> > > > > > > > Similarly with an electron.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [Krimel]
> > > > > > > > If we don't know what a germ knows maybe we ought to just talk
>
> > > > > > > > about what it does rather than making ass-u-me-tions about
> > > > > > > > what it knows
> > > > > > > > Similarly with electrons.
> > > > > > > [Platt]
> > > > > > > Every form of knowledge rests on assumptions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [Krimel}
> > > > > > > This places a heavy burden on assumptions. So much so that I
> > > > > > > think the burden of justifying the making of them rests on those
>
> > > > > > > urging the assumption. In these situations what justifies your
> > > > > > > assumption? What does it offer us?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Platt]
> > > > > > By "these assumptions" I assume you mean the above about a germ
> > > > > > and an electron.
> > > > > > As for what it offers us, read "Lila."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Krimel]
> > > > > > It is you who says, "That a germ knows that it's better for it to
> > > > > > be in one place rather than another can be assumed by its
> > > > > > behavior."
> > > > > > I am asking you to articulate your personal reason for urging this
> > > > > > assumption. Can you tell me in you own words
> > > > >
> > > > > [Platt]
> > > > > A better understanding of reality.
> > > > >
> > > > > [Krimel]
> > > > > Better how?
> > > >
> > > > [Platt]
> > > > Read "Lila."
> > > >
> > > > [Krimel]
> > > > That won't tell me what benefit you personally see to assuming that a
> > > > germ "knows" based on what it does.
> > > >
> > > > I believe you are capable of doing this but I could be wrong.
> > >
> > > [Platt]
> > > I just told you. I believe you can read but I could be wrong.
> > >
> > > {Krimel]
> > > Are you Pirsig's parrot repeating nothing? I have read and commented at
> > > length on specific passages. Are you unable to articulate your own
> > > beliefs or even to point to what you do believe in someone else's work?
> >
> > [Platt]
> > You asked a question and I answered. If you're not satisfied, that's your
> > problem.
> >
> > [Krimel]
> > I think this exchange, preserved here in toto, is an excellent
> > illustration of someone who appears to 'just happen to believe" something
> > but can't or won't articulate it. I thought you could do it but I guess
> > not. Feel free to try any time you feel up to the task.
>
> [Platt]
> Like I said, read Lila if you think I "just happen to believe." Maybe then
> you witll "just happen to believe" something, too.
>
> [Krimel]
> This issue is not what I think or what Pirsig thinks it is whether are not
> you, Platt, can state your beliefs. It is still on open question.
If an open question to you it's your problem.
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
