I like those suggestions Ron. I've said repeatedly that some of my favourite Pirsig writing is on lingusitics / etymology, of key quality related words (Good, Art/Rta, Fair, etc.) and that is at the root of misplaced expectations to achieve definitional conclusions in our interminable philosophical debates. (Personally, I find the fact that the "conclusions" remain circular is a very good sign that circularity is a good. The frustration is with those that still expect the circle to lead anywhere except the circle.)
It's all language and all language is metaphors (dead or alive) - you can approach understanding by using it but never arrive at a destination called definition. And what is good ? Good is a noun. Must ponder that more. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
