[Joe]
As I read the above, the power of your logic, Krimel, is impressive.  For
myself in speaking of the undefined, I propose two more levels for evolution
which are levels in consciousness only.  Bo¹s SOLAQUI is convincing to me.
The Meta-level MOQ is undefined, and only found in one¹s awareness.  A
further level of consciousness, which I accept to account for the note Si
(sidera), which I have no way of formulating, is as far as I can go. The
absolute is beyond me, and any description of its essence is only by
analogy, or denial.

[Krimel]
Thanks Joe. My own view on the evolution of consciousness goes more  
along the lines of its enormous expansion in the modern era. We are  
now conscious or aware of things all across the planet within minutes  
of when they happen. I will send this e-mail from Boston and you guys  
in Scandinavia will get it in seconds. We have instant access to news  
from around the globe and satellites in space keep a watchful eye on  
everything from the weather to troop movements. This is a greater  
advance in human consciousness than anything that has preceded it;  
beating out the telephone and printing press.

I would say, virtual wizard that I am, that cyberspace may be the new  
frontier as we all stake out territory in the limitless worlds we are  
creating outside of space and time where the old laws of physics and  
politics are rendered obsolete. These already make such cherished  
ideals as capitalism virtually meaningless. After all, capitalism is  
designed to redistribute scarce goods. Today the media capitalist are  
trying to use the power of government to manufacture scarcity.

I have to say you music scale analogy does not resonate with me, but  
then I used to be a musician who never learned to read music. It does  
seem to work for you so go with it!




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to