Hi David, Yes, repeatability, too, seems to influence the recognizability of what has been differentiated. Static to some tiny, or great, extent.
Marsha At 07:37 PM 4/25/2008, you wrote: >is not static what repeats? We re-cognise it, it's >the same again, the repetition means that something has >not changed, it is static to some tiny extent, the rest >is dynamic > >DM > > > > Marsha you said > > > >> I think Quality(Dynamic/Static). Maybe static quality is Quality > >> that has been differentiated. It is mind that determines to what > >> extent quality is static. > > > > Kinda sorta yes, yes, yes. How true. > > Ian > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
