At 03:16 AM 4/28/2008, you wrote: >Marsha > >wrote on 26 April : > >Bo earlier: > > >I have often used the ocean/wave metaphor, the waves are water > > >too, and in that sense the MOQ is a monism, but it's the waves > > >AS DIFFERENT from the smooth surface that counts, and makes > > >it a dualism. > > > Where does the ocean end and the wave begin? Where does the wave end > > and the smoothness begin? > >You are right, waves are water undulations so in that sense >...etc. but in that sense SOM is an monism too, and that it ain't >supposed to be? According to (the diagrams) in ZAMM there is a >"reality" before the the S/O division and in accordance with the >monism logic it's indivisible, indefinable ...etc. My thesis is still >that these diagrams are the source of the "Quality before the >MOQ" fallacy. Think about it. > >Bo
Greeting Bo, There is a difference between a discrete subject and object, and patterns of value, but I'll think about it. Marsha Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
