DM et al ... the key word being "useful" ie pragmatic (even if) not fundamental.
Ian On 5/1/08, David M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> [Krimel] > >>> I don't think it makes sense to talk about DQ like this at all. DQ is > >>> not > >>> a thing or a force. It is a property of Quality. It has descriptive > >>> value > >>> not causal efficacy. > > > > DM: I think DQ is more fundamental than SQ, as SQ is just a special > > case of dynamic qualities, i.e ones that are repeating. That qualities > > come and go and seem to interact with each other is what we mean > > by force is it not? > > > > [Krimel] > > Exactly, just as order is a special case of chaos. As a matter of personal > > preference I think it makes sense to retain a distinction between the two > > but I agree the distinction is artificial. > > > > DM: Yep, nonetheless the distinction remains unavoidably useful. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
