On Tuesday 6 May 2008 9:46 AM Ham writes to Marsha: <snip>
Consider the empirical difference between the subjective Self and objective Otherness. Self is the immanent, conscious locus of awareness. It has no being, cannot be objectively localized, measured, quantified, or observed. Otherness is all the rest. It is external, universal, substantive, quantitative, predictable. Awareness and Beingness have no attributes in common but are absolutely divided in existence. The only thing that holds this dichotomy together is the Value of the primary source. <snip> Hi Marsha, Ham, and all, I realize, Ham, that there is no ³evolution² in your vocabulary. However, as an act of courtesy you might acknowledge that the analogy of DQ/SQ is a metaphysical approach to reality in consciousness. I won¹t find it laying beside the road, of course, but it may usher in a way of thinking that is not so bloody as our current political strife. Since ³awareness and beingness have no attributes in common²I am a law unto myself. No morality from within, only from whoever has the most weaponry and is willing to use it, a "Bah Humbug!" metaphysics. Joe On 5/6/08 9:46 AM, "Ham Priday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Consider the empirical difference between the subjective Self and objective > Otherness. Self is the immanent, conscious locus of awareness. It has no > being, cannot be objectively localized, measured, quantified, or observed. > Otherness is all the rest. It is external, universal, substantive, > quantitative, predictable. Awareness and Beingness have no attributes in > common but are absolutely divided in existence. The only thing that holds > this dichotomy together is the Value of the primary source. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
