> Marsha:
I would like to see better where Buddhism and the MOQ agree. They both agree there is no SELF. I see patterns as conventional entitites. I don't think that DQ relates to emptiness. Static patterns of value are empty and are totally the product of conceptual thought. The four levels are the product of conceptual thought. The MOQ is a product of conceptual thought. Empty. Empty. Empty. Empty. I don't think the net-of-jewels model fits into the MOQ. This bother me. Ron: Hello Marsha, If the model fits your MoQ, there is no problem. The universals, as I see Them are keeping the mind open to change and open to a constant evolution Of your modes of understanding. Experience is a creative act like painting. I feel the MoQ is a radical metaphysic. If the net of jewels model Works and best explains your relation for you then who is anyone to Say you are wrong? Unless you were already expressing this, then I digress. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
