Regarding parliamentarianism.
Platt said:
What better political system would you suggest?
What we have here. It's not all the complicated. The people vote for whatever party with which they agree (and there should be more than two.) and according to how many votes the different parties get, they get an proportional amount of seats in the parliament - and the party that gets the majority of the seats (I.e the majority of the votes) then appoint the government (made up of their own party members of course) - and is a party don't get lone majority they have to make alliances with other parties, and perhaps the government will be a coalition of members of many parties - we have one such government now, consisting of members of four right wing and liberal parties.
The government may then act on a four year mandate, but the budget must be approved by the parliament, and anything regarding changing laws and the like must be voted by in the parliament.
Simple and clear - a representative democracy on the principle of one man one vote - and voting on party programs and ideas - not persons.
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
