Ron said to Ham: ...the tetra lemma logic which WILL support your assertion that both AB and NOT AB may exist without contradiction. Producing a tension of apparent opposites which is illusionary but existent in perception. Which I believe falls right in with your body of work.
dmb says: I don't get it. How is a logical contradiction only apparent or illusory and how does it exist in perception. Leaving aside Ham's essentialism, I really don't understand what the tetralemma means. I'm not even sure where the logic is located in it. Break it down for me, will you? _________________________________________________________________ Ron; Then you understand, it's a static perception breaker. S/o exists but it exists as a perception. Or kill intellectual patterns and morality will be served. Or experience seems contradictory when intellectualized. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
