[Ham] I've never heard of a theory being supported by the fact that it cannot be validated. Is that the explosion principle? (Try that out on Krimel, DMB, or Matt.)
[Krimel] There you go taking my name in vain again. If you are looking for an unsupported theory try: http://www.essentialism.net/mechanic.htm. [Ham] But I still haven't the foggiest idea of what you give creditablilty to as a belief system. [Krimel] The masterbaiter asks a leading question... [Ham] Leaving aside the logic, to what extent, if at all, do you agree with my ontology? [Krimel] He wiggles the bait. [Ham] I assume you like that idea, too' [Krimel] See the tasty worm? Your might really like it... [Ham] Some indication of your affirmation or rejection of this metaphysical ontogeny would be appreciated at this juncture. [Krimel] It's a lovely worm. Just try a little bite... [Ham] What say you, Ron? [Krimel] WATCH OUT, RON!!! There's a hook in there! Swim away, swim away.... and [Ham] Essentially yours (I hope), (As he smears a bit of oil in the frying pan.) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
