> Marsha:
> > The idea of this bread and these pancakes is so
> > wonderful..., so amazing....
> > It seems that it should be the most common experience
> to
> > make these recipes,
> > but it is like a special secret.
>
>
> SA previously: Acorns are everywhere around here, yes seems "it
> should be the most
> common experience", the simple beauties, the easy
> walks to the trees
> impeded and made into something secret and seemingly
> "holy grail", but
> this is what the separations over the centuries can do to
> popular
> culture.
>
>
> Ron:
> SA, I really enjoyed your series of posts. The theme of
> them is still resonating....
SA: Thank you Ron. It's nice to hear something like this every once in a
while. I've definitely enjoyed your logical arguments for the past weeks while
I've read some posts from time to time, while I've lurked in and out of the
forum. It's good to hear your logic played up against those that really don't
understand much outside of their logic. With you throwing out Greek names and
logical discourse backed by traditional logic, yet, in a way that shines
moq-style, your able to help those that think philosophy has to have a Greek
word or some kind of symbolic logic pop up somewhere in the thread. I don't
have the ability to do this. I like it. It's funny, but around when I first
joined this forum I used to discuss with Ham quite a bit in order to understand
him, yet, once I started to use my own thoughts he would say, no your wrong and
so forth. I argued with him about his nothingness and how it made no sense and
at least he has finally admitted
it doesn't, but it took him years to get that far. Also, this whole
separation in his analytics, which he has turned to now say he doesn't want his
philosophy to show separation. I for many posts when I first joined tried to
explain to him how separation is a false logic (to use a concept you've
mentioned), but I didn't talk Aristotle enough and he would just say I'm a poet
and don't know what I'm talking about. Well, it would seem Ham knew not what
he was saying and he should have listened to the poet years ago, for you've
recently convinced him that his philosophy doesn't make sense by emphasizing
separation and he has begun to incline in agreement with you. Well, anyways,
you get my point. I think much of this has to do with pigeon-holing where
thoughtful positions exist and has much to do with why philosophy departments
can't find students or something of interest to say that applies to everyday
life. Look at the moq, it's probably poetry to
many philosophy departments. Philosophy over the years has developed an ego
and strangle hold on what is considered intellectual, and that not only leads
into Ham, but definitely Bo. Yet, I saw this over a year ago, and it would
seem only you see the danger in Bo's hijacking of the moq, Marsha senses it,
and dmb recently posted something about Bo's deliverance of confusion. Why so
many get on Platt, but not Bo is weird to say the least. I guess in the
directions on how to chat in this forum, found in the moq forum webpage, horse
does mention to get somebody talking with you, you need to be controversial.
People like this biological impulsive stuff. Sex, drugs, and controversy
sells. Did you hear the lastest about such and such celebrity... anyways. I
know I have my set-backs and its' always difficult to ramble on about how
negative somebody is for an intellectual discourse on the moq, nobody likes the
dirty work. Bo's blank arguments have
always been his style, same for Ham, actually Ham will just quit talkin' to ya
when he's stumped. I do see dmb's point about Ian. It has taken me some time
to realize this, but Ian really doesn't say much. If everybody's happy, then
Ian's happy. He doesn't like disagreement, but hey this is a democracy and
people are goina' be their own art. And then there's me, with all this woods
talk, don't I have anything else to talk about then these dang birds.
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/