Platt:
> Please jog my memory. When did I write "evolve,"
SA: Didn't you say "consciousness changes" and you state "oops" is the answer?
I don't know if you used these words, exactly or not, but this is what the
discussion was about.
Platt:
> "need for an origin" and
> "intention."
SA: Discussion was about?
Platt:
> Do you believe that anyone here is duty bound to answer
> questions when he
> or she is described by the questioner as being a moron and
> a liar?
SA: Platt, this is getting old, don't you think? This whole discussion? I'm
trying to focus on the questions he asked. He did answer your questions.
SA previously:
> > From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham,
> with his "consciousness
> > evolves" comment and then his blatant disregard
> to comment upon this quote
> > of his. He probably doesn't even know what his
> own words mean. It's his
> > track record. His 'mo'.
Platt:
> Without offering any evidence, you charge is ad hominem.
> I'm surprised,
> SA. It's not like you to be like Arlo.
SA: As I said to Ian in the Disagreement [MD], it depends on what you mean by
ad hominem, for I don't see anything ad hominem about what I said, not at all.
Enlighten me.
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
