SA: > Platt: > > What "blatant lies" do you think I have > > perpetrated? > > SA: Well, I didn't use "blatant lies". I said "deceive", but maybe their > both mayapples. I think the point I was making was Arlo asked you > questions and you didn't answer them, and those questions are based on > your 'evolve', 'need for an origin', and 'intention' comments.
Please jog my memory. When did I write "evolve," "need for an origin" and "intention." > If you say > these events happen, but don't provide an answer - without even an 'I > don't know' comment, then what are you holding back? Thus, why I grouped > my answer with 'deception', 'hiding', or 'learning something'/'in > transition'. Do you believe that anyone here is duty bound to answer questions when he or she is described by the questioner as being a moron and a liar? > From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham, with his "consciousness > evolves" comment and then his blatant disregard to comment upon this quote > of his. He probably doesn't even know what his own words mean. It's his > track record. His 'mo'. Without offering any evidence, you charge is ad hominem. I'm surprised, SA. It's not like you to be like Arlo. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
