> Ron:
> > What I have difficulty with is that you use our
> western definition of
> > intellect as a universal blanket definition of
> intelligence across the
> > board. What this does is place our definition of
> intellect as THE
> > definition
> > of intellect and it places SOLAQI as evolutionarily
> superior with you
> > being
> > the pinnacle by virtue of the fact that you are the
> only one who
> > subscribes.
>
> Platt:
> Count me in as one who subscribes to SOLAQI as the
> Intellectual Level of
> the MOQ, at least in so far as I understand SOLAQI to be. I
> view all levels
> as defined by what is dominant in them. For me what
> dominates the
> Intellectual Level is the S/O division and the assumption
> of determinism.
SA: Platt. It's called the intellectual level. Don't complicate matters. A
little dogma shows through, a little unopenness on your part. I like the
intellectual level simply left as such named. It's more open-minded.
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
