At 08:51 AM 9/11/2008, you wrote:
dmb said:
Yes, Krimel, DQ has a negative face. Chaos and confusion and degeneracy
ensues when things are too dynamic.

Krimel replied:
At last, perhaps the MoQ can move forward.

dmb replies to the reply:
The MOQ can move forward? This negative aspect of DQ has been part of the
MOQ since the day it was published. Sitting on hot stoves is no picnic, for
example.

[Krimel]
Unbelievably, dmb and I seem to have found some common ground. Before it
turns to quicksand, who will join us in admitting that DQ is not always
"Good" or even "good"?

Krimel,

Disagree.  DQ is beyond description.

Where's you ventriloquist?

Marsha



p.s. This will be totally uninteresting to most of you, but I just changed my mail alert to the theme from Dudley DoRight of Bullwinkle fame. It sets receiving mail from you guys on a more optimistic note.






.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to