Woods, Here's what I did say about zeitgeist. http://www.psybertron.org/?p=1439
Ian On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Ian Glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woods, I did no such thing. > > You raised David Icke (in his connection with zeitgeist) ... I simply > expressed amazement at a reference to Icke on MD (I know he's part of > it ... that's very old news) > > I expressed no view one way or the other on zeitgeist itself - I said > my piece on that a couple of years ago when it was news. I explicitly > expressed amazement at the conspiracy theory processes in action. > Gobsmacked, lost for words. Nothing to debate. > > Ian > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Woods Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ian, >> >> You brought up David Icke as a dismissal point to >> any opposition of zeitgeist. For if David Icke dismisses >> zeitgeist, well, then this opposition is low value for David >> Icke is not credible. Well, if you knew that David >> Icke was also used as a source for zeitgeist what might >> you have thought. I guess if I use your line of argumentation, >> then zeitgeist is not credible for David Icke contributed to >> zeitgeist. So, that was pretty much your only line of >> argumentation that could have been a good foundation to >> ward off any opposition to zeitgeist and now I find >> David Icke is a contributor to zeitgeist so that pretty >> much rids your argument. Sorry, come up with >> something more debatable: >> >> >> http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/sources.htm >> >> >> >> woods >> >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
