Woods I see the confusion, the original Zeitgeist was already in three parts ...

You read too much into my only comment expressing interest and
amazement on one mail (I haven't commented on anything else in the
thread) I can't repeat everything I said years ago in every post. You
were assuming I was for or against something in the thread, and that I
have even read the whole thread ....

If you want my comment on something specific, just ask.

Ian

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Woods Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian:
> Here's what I did say about zeitgeist.
> http://www.psybertron.org/?p=1439
>
>
>
> woods:
>   Alright.  I thought you were saying that
> any debate against zeitgeist, any opposition against
> zeitgeist was a no-no.  You never really explain yourself very
> well.  All's you said, and keep saying even a most recent post
> of yours is it's a conspiracy theory.  What's a conspiracy theory?
> zeitgeist or opposition to zeitgeist?  This thread is called
> opposition to zeitgeist you know.  I could care less, meaning,
> you have your own mind to make up in deciding upon what you
> believe.  We all adults or can become free-thinking adults.  The
> point I simply was making for the hundredth time or millioneth, I lost
> count, is zeitgeist gets thrown around on this forum with
> no opposition, no debate against it.  So I thought I would
> provide one.  It's only healthy.
>
>
> woods
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to