>> [Chris does philosophy]
>> Well, he is wrong there anyway. When I hear republicans on FOX
talking
>> about
>> freedom they are NOT talking about DQ. They are talking about a
hollow
>> social value that don't mean anything except perhaps in the meaning
of
>> being
>> a mask for greed.
>
> How about a little philosophy, Chris, on why "greed" is wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Platt
aha my dear Platt - it is not wrong in itself - it is a huge help for the
biological level. though it is immoral for lower patterns to dominate
higher
ones you know =)
Dear Chris:
Do you are think all feelings (emotions) are biological?
Thanks.
Platt
No, not all emotions are of the biological level, though they all need the
biological level, and of course the levels are overlapping and
interrelated. But I do think that greed could be seen as a biological
pattern, the basic drive for survival is greatly benefited by it. But when
the social level comes along, it is important that it (the social level) can
get this under control. Similarly it would seem to be the intellectual
levels mission to, when reshaping social structures, to direct this drive at
something intellectually Good. Ideally though, the MOQ will show the need
for balance, because of course the intellectual level cannot build only for
intellectual Good, that has been the problem before, there must be a MOQ
perspective.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
