woods:
Good. I didn't intend those previous comments of mine to be directed
towards you. That's why I used the word "somebody" and "These kind
of people..."
Just makin' sure you know. Wasn't sure if you thought I was
directing this towards you in particular or not.
Andre:
Thank you woods, and I would like to generalise on this a little if you
don't mind. I think this discuss is great. We are all seekers and throw in
"feelers" about the correctness or not of our interpretations (1) about the
MoQ and then (2) about using the MoQ patterns/insights dynamically to arrive
at new understandings about the things we see, hear and feel around us and
also, perhaps to be a guiding light along the way. This takes a while and we
all have our different analogues and capacities and inputs...some more
"enlightning" than others.Some are part of this discuss much longer than
others, some are old hand at this stuff. Fine it keeps it dynamic.
We were all born in the same way but are we all born equal?
I do not see this as a 'personal' arena, I rather see it as an arena where
ideas are exchanged or rather intellectual patterns are thrown around and
the ones that are considered better than others... we all learn from.
Some may argue now that not all is "intellectual" that is exchanged.May well
be..call it drivel whatever.
I have done my thinking as well over the past few days. Some of it comes
from "intellect" muddling through other levels to get to a little quality
event which turns static and can then, perhaps, be the new step towards
development of an intellectual pattern which is useful.
Which has happened now as I wrote this down: I am speaking to the converted.
Thanks woods, Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
