Ham, Craig, Woods et al ... OK. We don't need a state to structure "all" of society, but we do have to identify "cases" where it is "reasonable" to do so ... ie reasonable to invoke social patterns to enforce "some" structure. (And resaonable must now be considered in a MoQist sense .. or we'll just get all the old answers again.)
This is just a starting point (and a vey old one at that). This is all I mean by "governance" ... organizing those "cases", and organizing when and where (in actual practice) the society of individuals at large gets a say in decision-making in that "organization". Woods, don't tell me the status-quo is the best we can come up with ;-) I don't want us to go back to first principles and start again, but I do want to improve on SOMist reality. Regards Ian On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:23 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Ham] >> we don't need a State to structure society. > > Good point. We should try to limit the state to cases > where we can justify forcing compliance. > Craig > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
