[Craig, previously] > Take the Law of the > Excluded Middle: p or not-p (e.g., 'it is raining' or > 'it is not raining'.) > It not like we experience rain, then no rain, then rain, > then no rain, but never anything else, so conclude that > it must be raining or not raining. > Rather logic is imposed on our experience of rain & > no rain in order to make sense of it.
[Ham] > Right, it could be snowing or hailing or fogging up. Snowing or hailing or fogging up are just ways of not raining (or they could be special cases of raining/precipitation--LOGIC doesn't determine which). [Ham] > WE impose our intellect on > experience in order to make logical sense of it (as in a working principle). Yes, rather than inferring our logic from experience. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
