Arlo,
If you think I'm freakin' angry! Then your freakin' right! I
freakin' take people anymore!!!!!
PEACE - A freakin' million times over !!!!!!!
PEACE
PEACE
woods
________________________________
From: Woods Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:20:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Here come the censors
[Woods previously]
can I spell it for you or will you still find this to be a paranoid statement,
P-E-A-C-E got it?
[Arlo]
Can you answer this question for me. Please. Just answer it.
woods:
I have been answering your questions. Sorry I'm not trapped in
your logical cage.
Arlo:
So here is the breakdown, taken to the extreme to dislodge those who would
pretend to ride a high horse.
(1) The military has nuclear weapons.
(2) Because of this, should everyone have the ability to own nuclear weapons?
If you answer "no", then we are simply drawing our lines at different points in
the field. I draw mine at explosives and weapons designed to destroy targets of
any size ranging from cars and houses on up. We can argue about where that line
should be, of course, but we start from the vantage of recognizing that there
MUST be a line.
woods:
I'm not talking about this. Ron gets it, thank goodness, because Arlo
your first painting me as paranoid black helicopter guy, Red Dawn too many
times, and now I pretend to "ride a high horse". This is freakin'
ridiculous!!!!!!!
Arlo:
If you answer "yes", then we are no longer on common ground, and we'll have to
agree to disagree. If you think a world where every person can buy and own
their own nuclear weapon would be "better", "safer" or "freer" than our present
one, then go ahead and make that case. This would be the position of there
should be NO LINE.
woods:
Arlo, instead of everybody having to fit into
your paradigm why not consider something
else for a change?
I said, repeat, once the weapons become so
dangerous that most people can not have them,
then the weapons are just that - too dangerous
for anybody to have them. It's called the power
in the hands of the few, thus, the road to
tyranny. My call is for peace. Your call
is for let's see:
Arlo:
I say "no". I fully support a "double-standard" that gives only one group (the
military) access to these weapons.
What do you say?
woods:
You are saying arm 'em up! Give 'em what
they want. Arm up the military industrial complex!
Give 'em nukes. Give 'em what they want. Your
a war-mongering tyrant it would seem. Socialism
where the faith and blind ones give-up their
own morality and give it to a designated state to
have the power of morality without question and
you take morality away from people in general. You
question my morality!!! This is spiritual suppression
at its' worse, Arlo, step back and take a look at
how you are labeling me and coming up with
all kinds of way to bash me with labels, upon labels,
with your saying of me that I think of black helicopters,
watch too much Red Dawn movies all because I call
for peace! What the freak is happening!
Arlo:
As for the charge of paranoia, can you then further explain to me why you feel
uneasy with the idea of only our military (some people, but not you) having
access to nuclear weapons?
woods:
Nuclear weapons could destroy this world! Are you
freakin' kiddin' me? We need to get rid of these nukes!
my goodness,
I've now been baffled,
what the freak,
I'm freakin' fringe
for callin' for peace
in this forum,
I'm freakin' paranoid
and am labeled
as a black helicopter
paranoid and
a too much Red
Dawn movie watcher,
all because I'm callin'
for freakin' peace,
I'm tired of this forum,
I freakin' quit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNCLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
