KO
I've been thinking about this as an example. I've admired leaders
and systems of thought that recommend they not be taken as true, but
should be experienced and evaluated accordingly. Then we have
Science that has Quantum physics as its highest theory. But we're
told that if we think we understand it, we should think
again. Doesn't particle theoretical physics inhabit a virtual world?
Marsha
At 07:19 AM 11/16/2008, you wrote:
Hi Andre, we see an example of this with the new virtual worlds.
They have an addictive quality because of the freedom of expression they
offer but there are downsides in that the needs of the physical body tend to
be ignored; so strong is the stimulus to the social and intellectual aspects
of our being.
-KO
2008/11/16 Andre Broersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marsha:
>
> >And my other twist to Roger Waters' 'Give any species too much rope and
> >they'll fuck it up' is substitute the word 'species' for level.
> I'm not sure what you mean???
>
> Andre:
>
> I only mean that when the social or intellectual level is left by itself,
> unchecked by other levels, (i.e. 'forgetting it's parent level) it has a
> tendency to go off on its own. This can lead to disaster. Pirsig cites
> numerous examples of this in both ZMM and Lila.
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
