Marsha, no we cant touch them as you mean. But we understand them well enough to be able to build new technology with them - like the monitor and keyboard you touch now.
-KO 2008/11/16 MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > KO, > > Can you see, hear, smell, taste or touch things like electrons, protons and > neutrons, and their sub particles without the use of super-duper imaging > machines? > > Marsha > > > > > > > > At 07:56 AM 11/16/2008, you wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> the way i see it thinking about quantum physics takes place in the >> intellectual part of being; even so, there are social and even physical >> aspects to that process of thinking. >> >> I am aware of only one representation of particle theoretical physics in a >> virtual world - Wizard Ginoids reconstruction of the E8 polytope - >> probably >> various universities are modelling the quantum world virtually also, but i >> am not aware of them. >> >> 2008/11/16 MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >> > >> > KO >> > >> > I've been thinking about this as an example. I've admired leaders and >> > systems of thought that recommend they not be taken as true, but should >> be >> > experienced and evaluated accordingly. Then we have Science that has >> > Quantum physics as its highest theory. But we're told that if we think >> we >> > understand it, we should think again. Doesn't particle theoretical >> physics >> > inhabit a virtual world? >> > >> > Marsha >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > At 07:19 AM 11/16/2008, you wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Andre, we see an example of this with the new virtual worlds. >> >> They have an addictive quality because of the freedom of expression >> they >> >> offer but there are downsides in that the needs of the physical body >> tend >> >> to >> >> be ignored; so strong is the stimulus to the social and intellectual >> >> aspects >> >> of our being. >> >> >> >> -KO >> >> >> >> 2008/11/16 Andre Broersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> > Marsha: >> >> > >> >> > >And my other twist to Roger Waters' 'Give any species too much rope >> >> and >> >> > >they'll fuck it up' is substitute the word 'species' for level. >> >> > I'm not sure what you mean??? >> >> > >> >> > Andre: >> >> > >> >> > I only mean that when the social or intellectual level is left by >> >> itself, >> >> > unchecked by other levels, (i.e. 'forgetting it's parent level) it >> has a >> >> > tendency to go off on its own. This can lead to disaster. Pirsig >> cites >> >> > numerous examples of this in both ZMM and Lila. >> >> >> > >> > . >> > . >> > The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a >> > reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony >> without >> > end. >> > . >> > . >> > >> > >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list >> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> > Archives: >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >> > > . > . > The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a > reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without > end. > . > . > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
