Hi Ian On 9 Dec. you said to Ron: > Two great points in there, either of which I still live in hope of Bo > noticing.
I'm an old man and can only manage it "once a day". Regarding the previous logic issue I can't see how it can be expanded. 2+2 is 4 in MOQ too, but it's premises brings an in-out-turn of many things. One major turn is from SOM where intellect = mind to MOQ where its 4th. level = mind/matter distinction. As long as this isn't understood or accepted, the MOQ isn't understood. > (1) the social acceptance (received wisdom) angle of, err .. truth ? > (the entanglement of the socio-intellectual - cultural context - > levels) (2) the pointlessness of the metaphysical naming, when we are > talking about pragmatism, particularly the kind of enlightened > pragmatism we arrive at after the "experience" of such a huge amount > of intellectal (and rhetroical) effort. ??????????????????????????????????? Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
