Chris, Why can't it ?

Because saying "A causes B" as some explanation of a process of
physical causation between objects A and B only makes sense when
thinking of A, B and the process "C" as discrete objects. Good common
sense SOMist short-hand, but full of traps if A, B and C have more
complex inter-relations.

(I'd recommend Paul Turner on "as if" / "dependent arising" causation.)
Regards
Ian

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Christoffer Ivarsson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Allright, answer me this, just quickly - why can't the explanation of a
> performed action
> by an individual be explained only in terms of physical causation?
>
>
>
> Regards
> Chris
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to