> > [Chris] > > Allright, answer me this, just quickly - why can't the explanation of a > > performed action > > by an individual be explained only in terms of physical causation? > > [Platt] > "There is always this open end of Dynamic indeterminacy." (Lila, 11) > > [Krimel] > So what you and Pirsig are saying here is, "Ooops"?
[Platt] "Ooops" means evolutionary changes occur without purpose. "Dynamic indeterminacy" means evolutionary changes occur in response to something better, i.e., towards the "fittest." The difference is well spelled out in Chapter 11 of Lila which we all know you summarily reject. [Krimel] The word is 'indeterminacy". Look it up. It means that for better or for worse the outcome can not be determined. But yes, Chapter 11 is so full of misconceptions that it is should be embarrassing to anyone who wants to take the MoQ serious. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
