> Krimel said: > Energy is dynamic is fields of force moving and flowing fluidlike. Matter is static, it is fields of energy compacted into stasis. > > dmb says: > Well, that description certainly makes sense but in the context of the MOQ it is deeply confused.
[Ian] Actually I would have said the opposite DMB but end up agreeing with your point. Seeing matter as "static" is just sloppy / confused common sense short-hand, the reality of any model, physics or the MoQ, is that .... the "matter" is just one of the more stable (static) patterns in things, as you say. The MoQ IS sense ... better sense than much recieved widom of so-called common sense language. [Krimel] I am familiar with the Matter Myth. But I didn't think the discussion with dmb had reached that level of sophistication. If it had, I would have used it to place more emphasis on what I consider to be the fact that, in the real world stasis can not be completely removed from the dynamic and the dynamic can not be removed from the static. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
