Bo and all MD --

After reviewing the elaborate diagrams Bo has reconstructed from Pirsig's
box representing Reality according to the MoQ, I see his argument as follows:

In LILA, which superseded ZMM, Reality is represented as:

                                       Quality
                                            |
               Dynamic Quality -slash- Static Quality
               (pre-intellectual)            (intellectual or S/O)


Bo insists this is wrong, arguing instead for a variant of the original ZMM diagram which appeared (in Pirsig's SODV paper) like this...

              DYNAMIC QUALITY
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| INTELLECT | Subjective | |<--- Static
                      |          SOCIAL PATTERNS         |       Patterns
                      |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -|
                      |     BIOLOGICAL PATTERNS     |       Objective
| |<--- Static
                      |      INORGANIC PATTERNS     |        Patterns
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

...but, according to Bo, "should have" looked like this:

              DYNAMIC QUALITY -slash- STATIC QUALITY
                                         (intellectual or S/O)

[Bo explains]:
In the complete MOQ the static range is enlarged with the four
levels where intellect comes last [first?].

If Pirsig had meant that the top box(es) were to disappear after
the splits all would have been fine - SOM would have been the S/O
and the MOQ would have been the DQ/SQ - but as it is the top
boxes remain and has created the said Quality/MOQ
"metaphysics" that seemingly override the MOQ.

I gather that Bo wants the primary split to be labeled "Dynamic/Static" instead of "Subjective/Objective", "Intellect" to be shown under "Dynamic", and all patterns shown under "Static".

My own view is that Pirsig wanted to differentiate between subjective and objective patterns (the "SO--" in his presentation title), while also accounting for a Dynamic/Static split. Intellect is clearly the oddball here, because it is a function rather than a pattern. But what makes Intellect "dynamic" for Bo and Quality "dynamic" for Pirsig I have not been able to fathom. In any case, neither Bo nor Pirsig seem to recognize subjective AWARENESS as an agency distinct from all values, levels, patterns, objects, experiences, or concepts it perceives. If existential reality is understood to be the result of a dichotomy or split (which I believe it is), clearly Sensibility (i.e., pre-intellectual awareness) must be one of the contingencies.

In my opinion.

--Ham
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to