> [Arlo]
> My point is that (IMO) the Occidental tradition has spawned
> the most aggressively anti-esoteric responses in this history. 

MP: ??? Did you mean that to be "anti-*exoteric*"? Roman Catholicism for 
instance has become distinctly esoteric so far as to insist its mass be 
practiced 
in a language only its preists (and a few itinerant philosphers) still 
understand. 
How much more esoteric can you get? Eastern Orthodox Christianity on the 
other hand, a distinctly "Oriental" version of Christianity (and a near twin of 
RC 
from a theological standpoint given RC/OC was the first Christian schism) has 
its liturgies served in the language of the culture in which it is found (and 
its all 
over the world) in the style of that culture, emdedding cultural traditions as 
part 
of the feast celebrations, etc... pretty anti-esoteric as I see it. Both 
Christian and 
nearly alike theologically, but entirely different mostly due to an 
Occidental/Oriental historical divergence. And its the Occidental that is by 
far 
the more esoteric in its practice.

Or are we hitting another semantic roadblock on my part with "esoteric" and 
"exoteric"? 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to